The Political Ad

Does anyone running for office these days talk about the issues? Do they talk about how they would solve today's challenges? Do they frame their behavior around service and the common good? Do they listen and seek expert advice from the available science and research? Do they put Country ahead of self-interest?

The sad answer is, for the most part, no.

So, we are asked to focus on the negative ad of one’s opponent. Not on the challenges facing the individuals they serve or the nation at large, let alone the solutions they would offer. Worse, negative ads, when you look at the facts, are slanted and often taken out of context or simply untrue.

I suppose the example set by the current President gives our elected officials air cover for such behavior. If any CEO tweeted what comes out of the White House these days, the board and shareholders would remove them in short order. 

To be clear, both parties must examine their own conduct. The money flowing into politics undoubtedly has influence. And not necessarily in the interests of the individuals represented by members of Congress.

The founders clearly did not envision public office as a career. They established checks and balances and allowed for amendments as circumstances evolved. They crafted the Constitution so laws could adapt and become more inclusive, and they trusted officials to uphold high standards and put the country first. The three branches of government were designed to ensure balance and accountability.

Sadly, we now have political attack ads and tweets. We have allowed greed to replace stewardship, leadership, and a focus on national and global challenges.

I want to see a return to fact-based civil debate, representation, and the rule of law that protects all citizens' interests and our future. I want to see it in the ads, articles, and reporting.

Grandchildren over greed.